#IDFORUM2021
  • IDForum 2021
    • Background >
      • Team
      • Speakers
      • Participants
  • Programme Outcomes
  • Evaluation
Picture

Programme & Outcomes

Agenda & Objectives

The #IDForum2021  resorted to participatory methods to bring concrete examples, share tools, practices, and experience the local realities.

The Forum offered  several opportunities for participants to interact and contribute to the #IDforum2021 objectives:
Picture: celebrate logo
Celebrate together what has been achieved in the current EU youth programmes
Picture: inspire logo
Find some inspiration from others’ practices and projects
Picture: get ready! logo
Get ready for a new Inclusion & Diversity Strategy and a next programme generation
Picture
  • Check out the sessions and workshops in the final agenda. 
  • Click on the tabs for descriptions of the workshops, good practices, ​ plenaries, and conclusions.
  • Click on the infographics for a larger view. 
Picture
Picture
  • WELCOME
  • MARKETPLACE
  • GOOD PRACTICES
  • GOOD PRACTICES (WEB)
<
>

Official opening and past achievements 

Picture
Official Opening

Official Opening


The Forum was opened with speeches by:

  • Sophia Eriksson Waterschoot, director of the ‘Youth, Education and Erasmus+’ Unit from the Commission
  • Hina Bhatti, councillor of civil affairs and accessibility in Ostend
  • Koen Lambert, director of JINT 
Inspirational Speech

Inspirational Speech

Tony Geudens, project officer Salto Inclusion & Diversity, presented past achievements from previous generations of youth programmes in the I&D field.

Presentation available for download: 
Past Achievements.pdf
File Size: 4080 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Marketplace of good practices

Picture
This was an opportunity to showcase good practice, make them tangible, shareable, visual or digitally enhanced. Since there is diversity in the type of good practices, there was diversity in the way these 9 good practices were shared on site and online. 

Click on the titles + for further details
Outward Bound Croatia, Zagreb
Picture
Main Activities: ​Outdoor education programmes based on experiential learning methods, Erasmus+ and ESC youth and youth worker mobility projects.

Brief description
​As a nonprofit organization, we offer programs that foster experiential learning in nature. We are guided by the values of responsibility, courage, cooperation, and compassion in our work and in our programs.
For whom?​
​Economic obstacles, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles
European Youth Village (Romania)
Picture
Picture
Main Activities: ​European Youth Village Program offers a positive model of community development and community organizing of the young people in rural areas.​

Brief Description:
Here, people can find out more information about how European Youth Village works and how in the last few years has created a new movement in the Romanian Youth Sector. 

For Whom?
​Health problems, Educational difficulties, Cultural differences, Economic obstacles, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles. 
Caravan Circus Network
Picture
Main Activities: Using circus arts as a tool for social inclusion. ​​

Brief Description: 
Presentation of the project Circus as Intercultural encounter, analyzing how circus project engage with diversity and inclusion.

For Whom?
Disability, Cultural differences, Social obstacles.​
Picture
​European Commission
Picture
Main ​Activities: European Institution.

Brief Description: 
Humanitarian Aid - European Solidarity Corps​.

For Whom?
Disability, Health problems, Educational difficulties, Cultural differences, Economic obstacles, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles.
Picture
Association for supporting Youth and Adults with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Main Activities: 
​Consulting (one on one), workshops for youth adults and parents, educating volunteers, raising awareness, self advocacy.

Brief Description: 
Manual with workshops - Supporting youngsters with Autism in youth work, QR codes with our web page and a video on youtube, presenting our work also with online magazine on the laptop. 

For Whom?
Disability, Health problems, Educational difficulties, Cultural differences, Economic obstacles, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles.
Picture
​Jaunimo laisvalaikis, Marijampolė
Picture
Picture
Main Activities: Video interview on raising children with down syndrome, local sport event, different online workshops.

Brief Description: 
We are sharing the idea how young people made a change in the local community by helping its member - people with and without disabilities - to learn to better communicate with each other and thus change their attitudes towards each other.

For Whom?
Social obstacles.
Cesis municipality, Priekuli association Youth center "Apelsins"
Picture
Picture
Main Activities: Participation of rural and urban youth in promoting  the quality of life.  

Brief Description: 
We are a small youth organization that works together with others  to help improve the quality of life of young people! We work on both European and Latvian level projects and promote the self-growth of young people through them!

For Whom?
Disability, Health problems, Educational difficulties, Cultural differences, Economic obstacles, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles, Rural areas.
Youth Up North, Boden municipality, Sweden
Picture
Main Activities: Organize activities and forums for youths living in rural areas.

Brief Description:
The project goals is to make youth in rural areas feel more included and involved. We organize hackathons, workshops, meetings and activities. Information of the project and a website. 

For Whom?
Geographical obstacles. 
​Involve Youth Project Meath Ireland 
Picture
Main Activities: Activities to support Irish Travellers to reach their full potential including educational programmes, mental health, sport & more.  

Brief Description: 
Focused on the STATUS toolkit and training delivered by Involve to make your service universal for Irish Travellers. It can be adapted for any culture. It provides a self assessment tool to create an inclusive and diverse services for other cultures and minority cultures. I focused on how working on your environment/culture that you can you create a very inclusive environment for minority cultures. 

For Whom?
Educational difficulties, Cultural differences, Social obstacles, Geographical obstacles.
Picture

Good practices sessions

Picture
Parallel sessions on sharing tools and results
The afternoon of the 30th of November was dedicated to sharing good practices, tools,  and outcomes from different countries that might be useful to adopt in local realities and contribute to the future of the ID projects. The presentations took place in the form of parallel sessions with a  few practices  selected by the facilitators from the info submitted in the registration form.
Back in plenary after the two rounds of sessions, the participants worked in small groups to identify challenges in their own ID projects, achievements, and potential solutions to overcome them.  

Click on the titles + for further details
R1.1 Solidarity Coffee
Picture
Ieva Kaupaite -  Jaunuolių dienos centras, Panevezys, Lithuania
Picture
Five young people with intellectual disabilities and two social workers initiated a coffee kiosk aiming to expose themselves to local community, fight existing prejudice as well as gain practical labour market skills. The idea was highly supported and gained momentum very fast and become a phenomenon attracting a lot of attention from local and national stakeholders.
Session report
ESC project, started in 2019 by an organisation working with young people with intellectual disabilities and resulted in 3 SC projects. Coffee is made by young people with intellectual disabilities wanting to be more involved and visible in the local community, to break out of isolation. It was their idea, and they asked for help with the application, training on preparing coffee with machines, teamwork, working with clients, etc.. As a result,  people from the 1st SC project acted as mentors for the ones in the 2nd & 3rd.

Impact
Project 01: 
- 1052 cups of solidarity coffee,
- improved skills of YPWD,
- their dream became true,
- generated a new solidarity coffee project - follow up,
- followers on social media & national media coverage,
- award for best youth project and best youth worker of 2020,
- put the town on the map, as people from other cities started coming.
Project 02:
- 842 cups of coffee;
- partnerships in different youth initiatives
- and a new idea for coffee bike project.
Coffee bike project:
- A better way of spreading ideas, greater visibility,
- more mobile, 200 km,
- 200 people reached and
- employment opportunity.
In 2021 SC 3 was born. Planning to involve also other young people with disabilities and with limited chances for employment.
 
Main challenge(s)?
- Because of Covid-19, they could not attend the events, so instead, they did online courses for other young people on how to serve coffee or implement similar projects;
- Urban infrastructure developments: made it difficult to serve coffee on the street - moved to doing events;
- Declining motivation, young people were tired - got vacation for the regular SC team.
           
Main learning points
- Know how: make best coffee, work as a team, dress properly, serve clients.
- Attitude in the town towards YPWD changed a lot.
- The community feeling increased.
- Young people with disabilities felt empowered.

Questions & answers
Is it possible to repeat/get funding the same solidarity project? Yes, if it gets more new people on board.
 
Other remarks
Ideas for the future given by participants from the workshop: expand to the capital, home delivery, make social business out of it, making and roasting own coffee beans, involve other target groups, invite local artists, make solidarity gifts, organise youth exchange; cooperation with Starbucks, start cooperation with hospitality schools, those who were involved in SC1 & 2 could pass their knowledge to students of those schools. This would also be good for their self-esteem and skills development.
R1.2  ​EUROPEAN YOUTH VILLAGE PROGRAM
Picture
Victor Catalin - Asociatia pentru Dezvoltare Activa ADA (Bacau, Romania)
Picture
European Youth Village is a positive model of community organization and community development for young people in rural areas, which can be replicated at international level. Through this program, we address in a strategic way the problems, needs and challenges of young people from rural areas and we create development opportunities for them, in those areas.
Session report
A lot of youngsters still live in rural areas. If they want to go to highschool, sometimes they have to wake up at 5 o'clock and they are back very late in the evening. So, there is no time to do any activities, for example, volunteer work. There also no activities for youngsters in the rural areas. Transportation is difficult and, eventually they move to the city when they are 18 or older. Young people from rural areas are often forgotten, left in the dark. So,  they want to give them a voice.
 
Impact
The project  was born out of  frustration. They aim to offer a positive model of community development of young people in rural area, which can be replicated at international level. They want to give them a voice, and make sure that youth movements are formed. The title is given to the villages or rural communities who make a real change in the youth life. A nice example is Suscot 2019: they supported the youngsters to fill in the application, help them to find the right channels. It gives the youngsters more self esteem. the project included  Movie Days, treasure hunt, workshops, festival, participation local consult meetings, music, sports activities, environmental  awareness campaigns, winter festival among others.
 
Main challenge(s)?    
How did they find the youngsters who wanted to participate? They went to a school and had a meeting with the principal. He forgot to inform the pupils, so there was no meeting. But they didn't leave it like that. They went from door-to-door, and so it grew organically. An informal network of young people was born.
 
Main learning points
Don't forget youngsters from rural areas!

Questions & answers
Does the organisations give grants? No,  but they show them the way to get them.

Other remarks
https://europeanyouthvillage.eu/
R1.3 YOUTHS AGAINST RURAL DISADVANTAGE: IRELAND WEST
Picture
Maura Thornton - Ireland Youth Group West against Rural Disadvantage, Westport Co Mayo. Ireland ​
Picture
We build community, united by our music and by our belief in our leadership potential: through these we build a sense of belonging. We engage youths in projects designed and derived from evidence-based research that proves participation has a tangible long-term impact on these youth participants’ lives. Non-formal, informal learning and self-reflection are key to success. We attribute much of success to the fact we all enjoy evening music, song and dance together.
Session report
Maura Thornton developed a Leadership Program on the West Coast of Ireland. It started with a youth group gathering playing traditional Irish music, preserving Irish language and culture. The problem in the region is that young people are leaving the country, only coming back for holidays. The program tries to make them think about the possibilities of staying and being proud of themselves and their region. Maura shared a recent experience with an Erasmus+ Group exchange with Austria and Italy on topic of music but also involved mountain climbing, cycling, kayaking, dancing, etc. Everyday included different parts: leadership program, exchanging cultural practices, sports/outdoors activity, evenings playing music in the pub, which was all fun.
The objectives of the leadership program are based on evidence based research. They got inspiration from Simon Sinek (golden circle of leadership: why? How? What?), using Barack Obama and Martin Luther King as examples. Using a variety of exercises looking at their lives now, thinking about how to improve their situation, Discover their power and passions. Everyday a different method was used: to empower Self-reflection, force field analysing, the grow model (goals, reality, opportunities, will), happiness and self-development, and so on.
 
Impact
- Business sponsored the T-shirts that created visibility for the project.
- Inviting local politicians and a famous singer from the Chieftains.
- The Irish youth had never left Ireland, coming from rural schools- Although, at first they were shy, playing their traditional songs for their peers made them feel proud of themselves.
- There was a big impact on the personal empowerment of the young participants. Each participant received a self-reflection booklet that was completely private.
- Participants never did self-reflection before. They didn’t consider they had skills or had leadership potential before joining the project.
 
Main challenge(s)?    
Cooperation with one of the partners was not always easy because of a lack of organisation. In the end, all went well.
 
Main learning points
A good tip is to make a detailed programme that relates to your objectives.
 
Questions & answers
- How was it for a first time applicant? It was difficult to apply (first time). The application is too long and complicated.
- In a tourist area you have to make bookings way in advance. The reservations have to be paid before the project is approved (with personal budget).

R2.1 tourism for people with disabilities
Picture
Stanislaw Gurba - Fundacja Na Rzecz Wspierania Osób Niepełnosprawnych "Wyjdź z Domu"; Gorlice; Poland​
Picture
Organizing tourism for people with disabilities - exchange of experiences, the rights of disabled people to tourism, using the offers of travel agencies. The Foundation runs the only travel agency in Poland that tries to best adapt the offer for people with disabilities. At the same time, it has an offer open to all other customer groups and implements the idea of social integration during trips.
Session report
The "Leave home" Foundation has a travel office "Holidays at a good pace" in a small town of 30.000 people. It works with young people with disabilities promoting tourism for people with disability. The foundation employs 11 people including 8 people with disability and has a democratic approach to decision making. In 2020, 23% of surveyed people with disability took part in a tourist trip in the last 12 months. Most common barriers were: health condition, lack of finances, difficulties of organising a trip, fear of travelling no offers for people with disabilities and lack of information. Among the ways to make it easier, they promote a  greater acceptance of people with disabilities, look for more funding,  and the adaptation of offer, places and transport. Mostly, people with disabilities travel by themselves and/or with their families, and  there is no offer in Poland for them. This foundation is the only one in Poland, who caters to people with disabilities. Most of the volunteers are young, but people with disabilities may be up to 70 years old.

Impact
Tourism improves physical and mental health, increase self-confidence, improves well-being, breaking out of the daily routine, foster social integration, sense of independency, intellectual development, and changes in attitudes.
 
Main challenge(s)?
- Individual (private) tourism for people with disabilities is rare and it can be lonely, but through private travel with friends they can often do more.
- Tourism organised by NGOs is often on closed mixed ability groups and they are part of different activities and usually affordable with basic facilities.
- Tourism organised by travel agencies have almost no offer for people with disabilities, because they lack the knowledge of needs and ways to meet those needs.  It's a big time investment, transport is expensive and they fear of other customers that having people with disabilities will impact negatively their trip.
Most common challenges are: availability of the accessible transport; low availability of hotels with adapted rooms, finding accessible sightseeing routes with stops with adapted toilets; preparing an offer in a way that everybody feels equally important.
To overcome the challenges the Foundation uses the experiences of other groups:
- They listen to other people's advice, including clients ;
- due to the fact that Foundation employs people with disabilities, they have lower costs, thanks to tax reduction;
-  they use tourist benefits and priority rights that are offered to people with disabilities for the whole group, which also lowers the price of the trip and that makes it popular also among travellers without disabilities.
           
Main learning points
The foundation tailors trips based on the real needs, works with accessible and specialised transport companies and suitable hotels, and sensitized local guides. They make sure that everything is well planned and that for everybody the trip seems like an ordinary, regular trip for all clients, with or without disability. Among the ways to make it easier, they identified a  greater acceptance of people with disabilities, more funding, adaptation of offer, places and transport. 

Slides Available for download:
good_practice_tourism_for_pwd_prezentacja_inclusion.pdf
File Size: 3744 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

R2.2 project "Let's beat the silence together"
Picture
Bojana Gladovic - NGO Family Care, Belgrade, Serbia
Picture
The project "Let's beat the silence together" consists of  inclusive workshops for children with disabilities with children of typical development, training for teachers and parents, and media actions. Especially interesting for this project is that we designed and made a board for learning sign language for the deaf and Braille for the blind. These boards are located in parks, schools or promenades.
Session report
'I'm still driving!' is a project that introduces people who are in a wheelchair (spinal cord injury) due to an traffic accident, to inform students what the consequences can be if you drink/take drugs and drive a car.
 
Impact
They want to show what the impact is  in a human live, if you have a disability due to an accident, while drinking/taking drugs and driving. How difficult the accessibility is for normal day-to-day activities.
 
Main challenge(s)?
They look for people with the disability from the same generation as the students, so they can speak the same "language" to connect with each other.
           
Main learning points
- The training of the people who can inform the youngsters is very important.
- Accessibility is also avery important topic to mention.
R2.3 simulation session  ‘My Childhood Home’
Picture
Serap Yeter - Directorate Family and Social Service, Antalya, turkey
Picture
A simulation session which is tıtled ‘My Childhood Home’. It is also the name of a toolbox  developed to help vulnerable clients to be able to materialize and make sense of the experiences related to their maladaptive schemas and develop better coping mechanisms in an experiential way.
​Session report
Childhood home toolbox is an intellectual output of a KA2 project (that will finish in April 2022).
- A therapy house is made (maquette). Family members are presented as puppets.
- The game (made in wood) can be played. It is an inner journey to find reasons of emotional problem(s).
- The first step is to answer 90 questions (rating statements from (1) completely untrue to (6) describes me perfectly). The answers show your situation/character/emotional disorders/issues.
- There are schemes developed for 18 different issues like social isolation, self-sacrifice, failure to achieve, dependence/Incompetence, mistrust/abuse, pessimism, that can be used to have a conversation with the ‘client’.
- There are additional cards about the origins of these different issues.
- They are developed by clinical psychologists and based on the Stages of psychosocial development.
- The tool is used in orphanage centres, health care services, youth clubs, women shelters, rehabilitation centres.
- Guidelines for the tool and a video will be developed. There is a QR code shared leading to a google drive with all the documents and background info.
 
Impact
Not discussed, it was a simulation of a guided meditation.
 
Main challenge(s)?    
Not discussed, it was a simulation of a guided meditation.
 
Main learning points
Not discussed, it was a simulation of a guided meditation.
 
Other remarks
When users of this tool discover severe problems, they are advised to look for therapy. However, going to a therapist is not very common everywhere. Sometimes, it could be considered a privilege, whereas, in somes places therapy is for free.
GROUP WORK CONCLUSIONS: CHALLENGES - ACHIEVEMENTS - SOLUTIONS
ACCESSIBILITY 
Q1; main challenges we face during our inclusion projects/activities
  • Acceptance and awareness of accessibility needs.
  • Accessibility, both in terms of physical needs, like lifts, but also in terms of human resources.
  • Application process makes involvement of young people very difficult. 
  • Societies not accepting yet (infrastructure).
  • Reducing barriers and making projects accessible for ALL (simple language, screen reader).
  • Make health insurance  for projects more user-friendly.
Q2; main achievements in overcoming these challenges
  • Training and briefing about inclusion for external experts.
  • This forum and other networking events.
  • Online meetings create possibilities.
  • Work on tools to make information and participation more accessible.
  • Taking responsibility on implementing accessibility
  • More youths are able to participate.
  • Adapt to the needs of the few not make them adapt to others. Ask what they need, do not assume.
  • Making a test/questionnaire with young people in order to find out what they need (time, competences) before applying for an E+ project.
  • Providing information on which competences and how much time is expected /needed in order to send an application.
Q3; tools, measures can be put in place to create better solutions
  • All tools from European Commission should be accessible for people from diverse backgrounds.
  • A variety of ways to upload application (e.g. speak instead of writing).
  • A support system in place for the phase/time leading up to the project.
  • Reporting could reflect a good project (that may not be perfect, but have high impact for some young people).
  • Test/questionnaire + information.
 
FINANCIAL ISSUES
Q1; main challenges we face during our inclusion projects/activities
  • Lack of budget - especially when it comes to real costs linked to working with people with disabilities and fewer opportunities (minority group, socially disadvantaged).
  • Too much work for preparation and follow-up that is not covered/funded.
Q2; main achievements in overcoming these challenges
  • Make sure to find a way to bring project opportunities to recipients..
  • Outreach (enabling resources to finance those events).
  • Keep trying.
Q3; tools, measures can be put in place to create better solutions
  • Possibility for a top-up grant during project implementation to cover unforeseen inclusion related issues, e.g., participant needs personal assistance during an activity. Both for KA1 and KA2 possible ESC).
  • Need more indicators about the access of fewer opportunities groups to Erasmus+ or ESC and, we should know their opinion about the accessibility of a project.
ID COMPETENCES
Q1; main challenges we face during our inclusion projects/activities
  • Knowing what the target group really needs, and more ways of communication to discover it, e.g. pax not sharing their needs.
  • How to address the needs.
  • EU NAs and SALTO having not much knowledge about the actual field of work and needs of people with disabilities and fewer opportunities.
  • Lacking the understanding of realities (minorities, local organisations).
Q2; main achievements in overcoming these challenges
  • Training for NA officers, youth workers coordinators.
  • Peer support workers (experts by experience).
  • Training and field studies for SALTO, EU, NA workers.
  • Connection with actual field and stakeholders working with youngsters to have a better understanding of their realities.
  • Network of inclusion expert with easy access for NA and policymakers.
Q3; tools, measures can be put in place to create better solutions
  • Identify and challenge barriers  together with regular working groups to get feedback.
  • Recognition of the extra time and expertise needed.
  • International recognition, e.g., competences profile.
  • NA should allow more autonomy (more flexibility) to be able to adapt to the local needs (e.g., disabled people over 30 not being able to participate in ESC).
  • Gathering feedback of the target groups to see what their real needs are – Follow up – Make change – include them.
  • SALTO-led network of experts as a forum for advice.
​Communication and Outreach
Q1; main challenges we face during our inclusion projects/activities
  • To reach the young people with fewer opportunities and build trust.
  • Challenging for organisations to identify and visualize the impact of an inclusion project especially at the larger level (e.g. European Level).
  • Not going to a vulnerable community with the savior role/attitude.
  • Tailor-made communications materials for spreading information to everyone about programme benefits.
Q2; main achievements in overcoming these challenges
  • Build a network, build trust, empower the young people and make them feel they care part of the community.
  • Different communications channels attractive to young audience; peer to peer communication, teachers; and other networks that are close to young people with fewer opportunities..
Q3; tools, measures can be put in place to create better solutions
  • Sharing tools, grants,  & networking.
  • Visibility activities: raising awareness & strategic outreach.
  • Visuals, accessible, easy to understand.
​Sustainability
Q1; main challenges we face during our inclusion projects/activities
  • How to ensure sustainability of the project, even through other activities, or to continue involving and then funding becomes a challenge.
  • Make sure the results are relevant after the project ends.
  • Reaching the target group – involve, engage them during and after the projects is over.
Q2; main achievements in overcoming these challenges
  • Ask for help as a youth worker, when you feel you reached your limits even from other youth workers, or other stakeholders, including specialists.
  • Networking with local stakeholders as a good practice and being supported..
Q3; tools, measures can be put in place to create better solutions
  •  The sustainability accreditation, social business, CSR.
De Ambrassade - BRUSSELS, BELGIUM 
Picture
Main activities 
Supporting youth work organizations in Flanders & Brussels.
Brief description
We've made together with all the umbrella organisations on youth in Flanders a plan to work to influence (local) youth work and local authorities to become more diverse and inclusive. The plan starts from 2022 and ends in 2024.
Why? 
We are working ad hoc on diversity and inclusion. But there is really a structural plan needed in convincing, supporting our target groups to act more and better.
For whom?
Disability
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom? 
Our plan is made with partners and is also called a partnership between youth work organisations, youngsters, experts on diverse topics, local politicians and local youth policy officers.
When?
The preparations of this plan were finished in 2021. Now we focus for 2022 on the implementation of the plan.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
We have thought very idealistically and the plan has been translated that way. We know we are taking a big step and the feasibility of the plan is a big question mark. Still, we wanted to be comprehensive in what is needed around this topic.
IUVENTA-Slovak Youth Institute - Žilina , Slovakia)
Picture
Main Activities 
Monitoring dotation, Ministry of Education, Advocacy, Infodays, Networking, Workshop, Webinars, Participation (local strategy and policy for youth).
Brief description
The best practice is being together. It is important to have a time for a people sharing good and bad practices. We have monthly meetings (online breakfast). 
Why? 
In the Master Mind group, you attend regular meetings (either virtually or in person) and brainstorm ways to solve problems and become successful. The Master Mind concept is unique because you’re meeting with people who are in the same working field as you are.
For whom? 
Disability
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom?
Local organization in my region.
When?
Monthly, from April until now. We plan to continue next year.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
Summer time - people had many activities, project , camps. We had meetings with trips.
​Partners in Integration - region around Brussels, Belgium
Picture
Main activities​
PIN supports municipalities in the integration of inhabitants of foreign origin through peer support workers supporting newcomers to find their way.
Brief description
Navigate You(th) is a step-by-step approach to lead young people with a migrant background towards youth work: from tailored-made info on the local youth work offer to personal coaching and follow-up, from support to parents in understanding the value of youth work to involving local municipalities as partners.
Why? 
Youth work wants to be inclusive and to bring equal opportunities to all young people. Everyone matters, no youngster should be excluded from participating in youth work activities. It should not be taken for granted that youth work is always inclusive. Often special efforts are needed to create access to youth opportunities for young people that would otherwise remain excluded. This is in particular the case for young people with a migrant background (i.e. those who are born abroad, or whose parents are). Often they are not participating in youth work. And this for many reasons: they are not familiar with youth work, don’t have information about the existing local youth offer (e.g. youth centers, youth movements, cultural and art initiatives, sports, …), face financial or language obstacles, are newcomers in the local community, ... In addition youth organisations are not always aware of or prepared for the specific needs, concerns and obstacles these youngsters and their environment (eg. parents) might have. Active and tailored-made support is needed to get them involved in youth work and to make a solid connection between young people and youth organisations.
For whom?
Disability
Health problems
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom?
- Local municipalities (politicians and officials dealing with youth work, sport and culture).
- Social services.
- Local youth work providers (e.g. youth centers, youth movements, cultural and art initiatives, sport clubs, …).
- Families with migration background and children between 3 and 30 years old.
When? 
We started the initial pilot project in september 2017 thanks the Role Models Initiative set up by JINT (National Agency Belgium-Flanders). Over four years we have improved and expanded the project through partnerships with new local authorities.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
1. Reaching the target group seemed the biggest challenge, but by working with the the civil affairs service of the municipalities we get every month the contact details of all the new families with a migration background who arrived in the municipality.
2. The first peer support workers working on this project used to be newcomers/refugees in Belgium and didn't have knowledge about the rich local youth work offer. By working in duo with local volunteers, they are supported in navigating through the leisure time offer.
3. Sustainable anchoring of the project: the first 2 years we applied and got different project fundings. Thanks to that we were able to implement the project and show results. With those results, we could convince local municipalities to partner up for the local implementation.
4. The contact with youth work providers: sometimes it is difficult to get in touch with the heads of the sport clubs or youth organisations (for many reasons... lack of contact details on website, volunteers who are difficult to reach, ...). Now we ask the local authorities to support the facilitation of the first contact between the peer support workers and the organisations and clubs. This helps a lot!
5. More inclusive organizations: we are constantly collecting data, peer support workers register every preference, challenge and barrier that families encounter when choosing an activity. We measure impact and report all barriers, good practices and gaps in the leisure offer to local authorities. In this way we support local authorities in developing inclusive policies and support clubs and organizations to become more inclusive. Many more, get in touch! [email protected]
Outward Bound Croatia - Zagreb, Croatia
Picture
Main activities
As a nonprofit organization, we offer programs that foster experiential learning in nature.
Brief description
Half of the participants on all out activities are facing some kind of obstacle in their life; we adapt our programs and activities to the physical and cognitive abilities of our participants; we financially support youth with economic difficulties for their travel to the projects; recommendation letters are being written to future employers of our volunteers, etc.
Why?
By implementing the listed practices we feel and see that the youth on our programs are feeling more included, motivated, more heard and respected. We see them realizing that their disadvantages are not obstacles for their mobility and growth and that it takes only a bit of courage and a supporting organization to discover new learning opportunities.
For whom?
Health problems
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom?
Youth from foster care, foster families, correctional institutions, youth with refugee background, from rural areas of Croatia and abroad, youth from islands and from low financial and educational backgrounds.
When?
These practices are being developed through the last 8 years of our activities in international projects.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
The pandemic, language barriers, cultural differences. Everything being solved with patiences and a good project team.
Everyone Deserves a Holiday -  Brussels,  Belgium
Picture
Main activities
Everyone Deserves a Holiday mediates holidays for families, youngsters and children who have obstacles to participate in leisure activities.
Brief description
We are a partner network that brings together expertise, goodwill and social responsibility to realise the right to holidays for all. We are at the crossroads between supply and demand.
Why?
We strongly work together with (more than 1500) social organisations, who know the people who want to go on holiday or day trip. They work every day with these target groups to stimulate & convince them that holiday matters. Holidays give people a psychological boost so that they are able to cope again. Holidays promote health, reinforce family links and increase social networks.
For whom?
Disability
Health problems
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom?
Mainly families in poverty or with disabilities or long term health issues. We are responsible for, among other things, bringing together supply and demand in the field of social tourism. 560 tourist partners are associated and 1500 social organisations (and still growing every day).
When?
Over the past 20 years, still ongoing and growing every day.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
Communication is always a struggle and a solution at the same time. Keep on communication in every possible way (phone, mail, whatsapp, live, etc.) Bridging caps is a challenge every single day. Keep on telling stories, keep on sharing, etc. We keep bringing people and organisations together, so they can listen and learn from each other.
Asociación Promesas - Alicante,  SPAIN
Picture
Main activities 
Our interest is to help educators, leaders and young people to achieve more and improve their work. We promote Creative Learning Environments...
Brief description
We are taking the "Educational Escape Rooms" concept that we developed back in 2013, to the next step: To make them MORE INCLUSIVE and easy to design and adapt. Therefore 8 organisations from 4 different countries are developing a set of templates & formats to make Educational Escape Rooms Design more INCLUSIVE.
Why?
Our tools for designing educational escape rooms have been downloaded and used worldwide since 2013 for more than 3.400 people and many of them manifested they needed to be simpler to design, quicker and easier to adapt and make more Inclusive.
For whom?
Disability
Health problems
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Social obstacles
With whom?
Latvia: Gulbene municipality and Jaunpils Municipality; Netherlands: NGO Youth Exchange Service and Democratic Secondary school De Vallei; Spain: NGO Associación Promesas and Secondary school La Milagrosa y Santa Florentina; Italy: NGO Cooperativa Strana Idea.
When?
It started in December 2020 and IT will last until November 2022.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
To make sustainable materials easy to transport and to adapt.
ASSOCIATION for Youth and Adults with Spectrum Autistic Disorders - Ljubljana, Slovenia
Picture
Main activities
Individual support, supporting groups, activities for learning independent living, family therapy for parents, educating professionals and volunteers.
Brief description
Trainings for youth workers with the cooperation of the Centre for Youth Domžale (Slovenia). We organized 2 projects: Supporting youngsters with autism in youth work and Supporting youngsters with autism in youth work – Sensory issues. The youth workers got experience working with people with autism and that people with autism were active participants (giving ideas, organizing, …) of workshops.
Why?
Youth workers got the real life experience working with people with autism. Direct feedback from people with autism about ideas, workshops, products.
For whom?
Disability
Social obstacles
With whom?
Youth workers, youth and adults with autism.
When?
2019 - one week, 2021 - one week.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
How to motivate the people with autism to be part of the workshops.
- We solved that problem by inviting people with autism well in advance, the activities were structured, talk with them one on one, explaining the meaning of their participation (raising awareness by people with autism), people with autism gave the ideas for the workshops (speed dating cards).
Overload and anxiety of people with autism.
- We provided safe space (special room with calming products) and a safe person. We informed people with autism about that before the start of the workshops. Youth workers with autism
- We encouraged the youth workers to tell the organisers and other participants of the training in advance what kind of help they need, if they have panic attack, meltdown or other feelings of anxiety and how to react/approach.
Foundation for holistic and sustainable development Windmill Tree - Poland
Picture
Main activities
Mixed-ability outdoor activities.
Brief description
Mixed-ability educational trips to mountain.
Why?
To make world more closer to equity..
For whom?
Disability
Health problems
Educational difficulties
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
Geographical obstacles
With whom?
Youth, youth workers.
When?
2 years
Main challenge(s) encountered?
Cultural and historical and economical differences.
 Verein InterAktion - Austria
Picture
Main activities 
Erasmus+ youth mobilities with young refugees to promote active citizenship, human rights and sustainability.
Brief description
Erasmus+ youth mobilities as a tool for inclusion and integration by developing projects and activities together with the target group. A youth mobility gives our target group – young people, which were forced to leave their home countries for various reasons – the opportunity to experience non-formal education in a safe and international setting.
Why?
Because a youth exchange creates the most natural and safe atmosphere where participants are equal, being accepted the way they are and in a relatively short time can learn a lot at different levels. During a YE participants find themselves working together in different situations, subconsciously learning about other cultures and improving their abilities to deal with stereotypes and value the beauty of different opinions and different ideas. For our target group it is empowering when they are being involved at all stages of a project, activity or a youth exchange (brainstorming, developing, implementing, evaluating). However, their involvement needs to be continuously, throughout the entire year accompanied by stages of reflection and evaluation. This kind of participation gives them the confidence to explore their full potentials and creativity and overcome the barriers they are facing in their everyday life.
For whom?
Cultural differences
Economic obstacles
Social obstacles
With whom?
Local NGOs, municipalities, volunteers.
When? 
Ongoing since 2016.
Main challenge(s) encountered?
It might be challenging at times to give each participant individually the right support and space and time to develop and grow, so the entire team has to be flexible enough to respond to the needs of each individual of our target group and adapt the program and activities when needed by also considering needs of the international participants.
Picture
  • THE NEW ID STRATEGY
  • ID ROUND TABLES
  • THEMATIC WORKSHOPS
<
>

The new Inclusion & Diversity strategy

Picture
The new Inclusion & Diversity Strategy was introduced during a panel discussion with:
  • Marta Gutierrez-Benet, Programme Manager - European Commission
  • Hanna Schuessler, German NA for Erasmus+ Youth and the European Solidarity Corps
  • Jan Vanhee, Flemish Authority and EU Youth Working Party
  • Leo Kaserer, CEO CUBIC 

ID round tables

Picture
After the panel discussion, participants already seated at 6 tables and 1 online virtual table, each  hosted by 1 NA representative got a more focused presentation on the consequences of the new strategy on E+ and ESC programmes from the side of NA representatives  that led a  discussion via a short input. These small groups offered space for questions and a short reflection or debate. A Jint volunteer or one of the facilitators at each table acted as a rapporteur drawing the following conclusions: ​
Table 1
Table host(s):
​
Tine & Karlin
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • Experience needed to work on the ID & what the new ID Strategy is bringing in.
Main points or issues 
  • How is this Strategy making the new Programmes more inclusive and what are the novelties?
Opportunities
  • Strategy is giving a good push to those who are less experienced to start working on it.
  • Being a cross-sectoral strategy improves the spread of the good practices and knowledge over the different sectors.
  • Easier access to newcomers.
  • Organisations can get funding just by involving  young people with fewer opportunities, which is motivating more organisations to work on ID.
  • NAs are also developing their own strategies and putting more effort to be more inclusive organisations.
  • Local and national projects are good opportunity for young people with fewer opportunities.
Challenges 
  • How to prevent just that beneficiaries/projects are not just ticking the ID box, but are truly inclusive.
  • To make real work in all countries especially when it comes to people with disability.
  • Age limitation (up to 30), but a lot of people with disability can do it only later; there are often not ready for the activities before.
  • Still majority of ESC volunteers are students taking a gap year.
  • Registration of young people with fewer opportunities  in the mobility tool on the evaluation level.
  • Circle of not having enough people to lobby for it, not enough data to prove its need.
  • Lack of placements, not having enough organisations ready to host young people with disability.
  • Identify what is  needed for organisations working with young people with fewer opportunities and for the mainstream organisations alike, to answer the needs of young people with fewer opportunities and how to bring those needs together.
Next steps
  • Translation of the strategy to different national realities and creating national strategies and implementing those.
  • There should be a way for people to channel the information and need in order to make a change.
  • Better follow-up of participants and projects  better on all different levels.
  • Have more partnership building activities for organisations working with young people with disability.
  • Have a clear idea who can do something and on which level (organisations, NAs, SALTOs, COM...).
Table 2
Table host:
Irja
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • Youngsters with fewer opportunities: who are they, what's their reality?
Main points or issues
  • Acknowledgement:  make NAs awarey of the different realities involving young people with fewer opportunities. Fewer opportunities means much more than disabilities.
  • Language is an issue, also with youth workers, as people feel uncomfortable, or can't be who they are, cannot participate like they want.
Opportunities
  • A reality check is needed: get out there, go on the field, e.g. some kids starve during the week, some have no access to internet ...
  • Youth work practitioners can train the inclusion officers (of higher education staff, etc.) better, since inclusion is already better known in the youth field (of the youth programmes).
  • Funding  in the programmes to get people out of their situation.
Challenges
  • The statistics only give figures on the participation of youngsters with fewer opportunities at application stage.
  • People that are  reached out to, but  not only the ones with fewer opportunities and their parents have a lot of questions and need confirmation that the programmes are a safe space (also for Roma people).
  • There are 'serial applicants', organisations that seem factories, but on paper everything seems fine: how to get the small organisations with perfect work on the field to the programmes? There are also 'serial participants' that don't get the core of the programmes.
Next steps
  • Get out there:  explain things in an easy way, language must be clear, e.g. not everybody knows what 'reimbursement' means.
Table 3
Table host:
Nicusor
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • What opportunities do the programs & strategy offer to your organisations?
Main points or issues
  • How to measure impact of our inclusion-focused projects: need for tools.
  • Need to work on municipalities views of youth work and point at opportunities in the programmes.
  • Refugee crisis: programs can be used as a source to support them (e.g. at the Eastern European borders).
Opportunities
  • After COVID19, the E+ programs offer a environment to work with young people on several issues. Especially in countries where the government or conditions are not favorable, the European programmes offer opportunities.
  • We can cooperate and exchange on the development tools to measure impact.
Challenges
  • How to show the impact of social projects, especially when it comes to inclusion.
Next steps (not discussed)
Table 4
Table host
Luca
Table - Topic/ main issue
Strategy
Main points or issues
  • Budget issues.
  • Definition of barriers faced by youth.
Opportunities
  • Budget: 
  • There is an emergency budget for unexpected costs in projects.
  • Better budget in general helps in many ways, for example more suitable accommodation for young people with fewer opportunities.
  • There is Individual support and Organizational support.
  • Definition:
  • Definition of young people with fewer opportunities could help for better inclusion,  for example, Hungarian NA has been able to be more flexible in including a wider array of people.
Challenges
  • Budget:
  • Pocket money for Youth exchange, needed for some activities for example secret friend gifts.
  • ESC-budget cut made it difficult to plan for the long term.
  •  Youth workers don’t like to write applications. It’s a different thing to implement.
  • Support for preparation would be needed, especially young people with fewer opportunities need support.
  • How can you spread the info - not included in the budgets.
  • Definition:
  • It  can be stigmatizing,  for example, many youths fail to understand that their under medium income family is economically disadvantaged.
  • 'People with fewer opportunities' has negative connotations.
Next steps
  • Budget. There is an emergency budget for unexpected costs in projects. There is Individual support and Organizational support.
  • Definition. It depends  on how you explain to the youth: It’s not the person but the barrier.
Other remarks
  • Easy to get fixated to the project application.
  • How to get all the important info out.
  • ID officers can have only part of their work time dedicated to ID issues.
  • Before 2014 there was a reference of People with Fewer Opportunities that had a category of “Human” - Who makes the definition?
Table 5
Table host
Marjolein
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • Transfer of the ID strategy into a national ID strategy.
Main points or issues 
  • Share practices to translate the ID strategy into an effective tool to support inclusion and diversity in the European programmes.
Opportunities
  • ID strategy enhances even more than ever the importance of inclusion and diversity.
  • Cross-sectoral perspective: good to learn lessons, practices and insights from both the education and youth sector and share between them.
  • Each NA needs to have now their own ID strategy with a concrete activity plan, which makes the EU strategy much more tangible and brings it closer to the youth sector.
  • Valuable participatory and integral process within the NA involving many colleagues, in close consultation with the field, external experts, board members, trainers, young people, … listen to the voice of all!
  • New possibilities in the programmes for ID projects, by way of participation projects, small scale strategic partnerships, accreditation and quality labels for long-term and flexible approach,  with extra financial incentives for inclusive projects.
  • ID strategy stimulates an internal 'walk the talk' attitude within the NA, e.g. an inclusive approach in editing the inclusion strategy in accessible language, without losing content or not acknowledging everybody’s input.
Challenges
  • Keep on questioning ourselves on what we are doing, why and how; the strategy is there, but now it needs critical reflection throughout the next years, both within our own practice and towards the field.
  • Not thinking that we know what other people think, but ask and involve them in making this strategy work and actually happen, i.e. reflect from the perspectives of the beneficiaries.
  • Setting up inclusive projects is a long-term process with not enough financial incentives to cover staff costs to make this happen.
  • Do NAs in their staff composition represent the ID strategy (e.g. majority of high educated, white, straight, … staff members)?;  do they really understand what the youth sector needs on the level of support for ID? The struggles and challenges we face? Do they really understand the reality of the field? Need for an adapted recruitment policy with NAs?
Next steps
Adapt the implementation of the strategy throughout the coming years, i.e. flexible framework to work with, to adapt to emerging needs, new challenges, … Like it was said before in the panel, "it is living practice"
Table 6
Table host
Jane and Anja
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • How do you define people with fewer opportunities? What kind of information do you collect?
Main points or issues
  • Irish NA: create their own National Strategy, from Strategy to reality.
  • Inclusion in Norway, case processors, Inclusion strategy searched for communication and worked in smaller groups to reach for a bigger document in the end.
  • Spain: identify the fewer opportunities by trying to do reach out to more organisations who work with these groups.
  • In Austria, look at the website at examples, the outreach. 
  • Serbia: similar to Spain and Austria NA.
  • Hungary: The NA tried to involve the people from poor areas. They organised the travels.
  • Norway: Exercise ID Kitchen, that was a good start. People living in rural areas, immigrants, people with a variety of social backgrounds.
  • Austria: They do not define it. People with disabilities, like for example people in wheelchairs; instead, they have a focus on youngsters who are unemployed or don’t have an education. 
  • Ireland: They put the focus on the organisations that they define the people with fewer opportunities.

Opportunities
  • The programme gives a lot of flexibility, to overcome the obstacles.
Challenges
  • Language is a big problem, if they can’t speak English for a long term project.
  • Depends on the country: if it's big or not, with rural areas, if the youngsters speak also English and other language than their mother tongue, immigrants, people with a variety of social backgrounds.
Next steps
  • Start small and evolve to something bigger.
Online Group
Table host
Jutta
Table - Topic/ main issue
  • ID strategy
Main points or issues
  • Funding
  • Programme guide
Opportunities
  • Money – lump sums for inclusion support, sometimes it is not enough, so there it is a special support.
  • Having financial means to support young people, i.e. pay visits to the psychologist.
  • Possibility to have a support person, i.e. Extra group leaders – if needed, so they can feel safe and secure.
Challenges
  • Volunteering is full time, but for people with depression or panic attacks, it’s impossible to work full time. Or nap time during the day?.
Next steps
  • ID officers do not need to be experts, but  may use the support of  the experts.
  • Need to take into account realities in different countries; it’s better to take baby steps for the countries that join or start working on ID.
  • ID is not just a word, it’s in different parts of our programme guide so it is also the way NA guides beneficiaries. Read between the lines, think about how it is written and how we can put inclusion into action.
Other remarks
  • Should we be more flexible or strict to the words from programme guide? Or maybe the programme guide should take into consideration various situations?

Thematic workshops

Picture
Thematic workshops on ID Forum Day 2 were aimed to build capacity of the participants in the areas informing and contributing to the ID in quality (international) youth work and to identify existing challenges and gaps. After the the presentation, participants worked in small groups to identify challenges and possible solutions by way of sorting them into 3 spheres for action 
  • Sphere of control (solutions that I/my organization can do internally in relation to this challenge)
  • Sphere of influence (solutions that can be done in partnerships and through modification of use of the existing measures and within the existing policies)
  • Out of control (actions beyond existing institutional and programmatic measures – requiring new schemes or policies)
Click on the + sign to access the reports and conclusions for each session
Building a Culture of ID in Our Organisations beyond Mobility Projects -​ Rahel Aschwanden
Picture
Speaker: Rahel Aschwanden, ,  Co-founder Instituto NOW, Portugal
The workshop focused on the importance of mainstreaming the culture of inclusion and diversity in our organization, beyond individual (mobility) projects. Through shared practices and tips, it gave a chance to talk about benefits of such organizational culture for any organisation, its impact on our teams and beneficiaries, as well as the challenges we might face along the way.
id_forum_contribution_rahel_aschwanden_workshop_4.pptx.pdf
File Size: 2534 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Brief description of the session
How to mainstream ID in our organisations and how to make it part of our organisational culture? How to develop our ID muscles and put ID glasses on everything we do. Understanding of concepts of power, intersectionality, privilege, and equity.
Reference: SALTO ID "Embracing Diversity" publication & video: www.salto-youth.net/embracingdiversity/
 
Main learning points
  • It takes planning and an strategic mind to be inclusive. To sit down and see what that means and where we want to get.
  • Equity - is about giving everybody support they need and not giving the same support to everybody. Getting everybody on board to understand equity, be transparent and address the situations which might feel unfit to some members and discuss the organisational values.
  • Power - due to people's identities, we have different access to power and it's important to see how we can balance that power also in our team.
  • Intersectionality - we shouldn’t put people in one same box (like young people from rural area), as people are many different things and in order to support them, we need to understand overlapping identities and also obstacles.
  • Privilege - is also here in this room (some speak English better, some less, depending on opportunities in life we had or often one feels more encouraged to speak up and take the stage) and we should be aware of those. Take into account our own privilege and biases also when selecting and hiring people and how that act represents our ID values.
  • Different steps in being intentional about ID, which is a never ending journey: unawareness - gaining awareness - doing the work - fostering the culture.
  • It is important to reflect on how we call certain things and which terms we are using, especially if they are rooted in our culture and/or language. Make conscious effort, to question ourselves, to relearn some things, not to harm or hurt some people by using discriminatory language.
  • Creating space for curiosity, for not knowing the answers, but coming together and asking questions and learning about and from each other and not just put people in boxes and assume we know what they would say or need.
  • Calling "out" - we must speak out if something is really unacceptable and stand up for some other people, especially if we have more privileges. We have accountability and that means that we have to work also on ourselves, on our biases, but also allow ourselves to make mistakes.
  • Calling "in" - rather than putting a person on the spot we seek them out and try to create a space for dialog to learn and grow from it.
  • Community approach - connect more with the place you are immersed in.
 
Main challenge(s)?
  • Lack of knowledge amongst organisations. Often people are just not aware how ID is important.
  • Lack of projects for adults.
  • Lack of resources, people - in NA ID officers are multitasking and often do not have enough time for the ID; lack of time and finances.
  • Fear of unknown and of what that might bring, lack of knowledge. Fear of historical trauma.
  • Development of non-formal educational sector (still in starting phase in some countries).
  • Stereotypes based on culture and history.
  • Low standard of social support & intolerance especially towards people with disability. Treating them as they don't have voice or rights, making decisions on their behalf.
  • Capitalism - focus only on ourselves and our needs.
  • Sectorial, in the box thinking.
  • Lack of commitment and understanding why is this important.
  • Little conversation about added value of diversity, but a lot of attention is given to what are the negatives. Looking at invisible, not obvious differences.
 
Sphere of control
- Board games - creating rules that apply to everybody - level playfield. Everybody can participate. Starting from young people and their ideas and treating them equally as other members of the organisations.
- Lack of resources - dedicate more resources or sometimes just more dedication and communication is enough; making our work more visible.
- Increase transparency of our organisation.
- Lack of knowledge -  organise awareness activities, trainings for the staff.
- Sectorial, in the box thinking: challenging ourselves, each other and counteracting our limiting beliefs.
- Lead by example - having role models in the organisation, especially by leaders.
- Owning our own mistakes. Stepping up and taking responsibility for our decisions.
- Be aware of your own limits.
 
Sphere of influence
- Lobbying/sending signals where and what for we need more resources.
- Communicating our needs to hotels, restaurants... show stories, give evidence. Give recognition for their services.
- Talk it through, take extra mile, explaining what means having fewer opportunities. Deconstruct certain ideas. Educate.
- Programmes and policies should be backed up with resources.
- Create partnerships with local authorities and policy makers.
- NGOs need support from the public institutions, but NGOs should also support them, as sometimes they don't know where to start from and we might have that knowledge.
- Simulations of being in others people's shoes.
- Capitalise on results and showcase benefits of diversity (have and share good data) and good cases.
 
Out of control
- Free & affordable education for all (example of Nordic countries).
- Mainstreaming importance of inclusion and diversity in the education.
Addressing Mental Health and Wellbeing of Young People through ID Projects - Agoritsa Mandraki
Picture
Speaker: Agoritsa Mandraki, NGO CET Platform Greece
The workshop addressed the essentials on how participants with fewer opportunities mental health improves through participation in EU projects. It provided a space to share mental Health Issues and pre-existing conditions in general and to share examples of different issues that arose during past/current projects and the way they were tackled.

​Brief Description of the session
  • There is a lack of resources on mental health in different situations.
  • People are trying to hide their conditions, the problems surface during mobilities.
  • Do youth workers have enough mental health related knowledge?
  • There's a wide variety of mental health issues, family issues, health conditions, etc.  - You are never just a facilitator, leader, etc.
  • Mental health in covid-19 times.
 
Main learning points:
  • Create a safe environment: special dietary needs;  reference person (for mental health) should be appointed.
  • Ask for feedback, good practices, etc. from the participants; you can only guess/assume if you're not in that situation.
  • Youth workers should have the knowledge to identify mental issues, provide mental health first aid, reassure their own mental health so to be able to support the participants and colleagues. (e.g., share during Youth Workers Mobility, Youth exchanges).
  • There are possibilities in the programmes to tackle some mental health issues.
  • Digital youth work could be an opportunity for people to participate in projects, because otherwise they would not (be able to) join.
  • A list of publications and events.
 
Main challenge(s)?
  • Mental health of volunteers.
  • The variety of issues, and how to identify, provide first aid and refer them the right way. Also, keep the group safe and sound.
  • Availability of (English speaking) psychologists/experts, or online from the home country.
  • Mental health in Covid-19 times, during a pandemic.
  • Lack of procedures (referrals) concerning mental health; there is no(t enough) guidance. Raise awareness and make it open for feedback, to make it sustainable for further projects as well.
  • Tension within the role of the youth worker, NA, and family; finding the balance.
  • Balance between therapy session and project.
  • Try to remove the stigma and the shame.
  • Differences in other national realities: e.g., psychologists for free.
  • Put more attention on prevention and preparation, in combination with skilled experts and different methods.
  • Be ready and prepared to adapt and update the programme.
 
Sphere of control
- Educate yourself on the topic: SALTO training, read available literature, etc.
- Prepare an agenda on methods according to the needs of the group, considering the needs of ALL participants - start small; create a safe space to try to tackle the stigma.
- Prepare a crisis management plan for projects, including mental health aspects, accessibility, etc.
- Training on mental health for youth workers.
- Thinking of a back-up plan.
- Set up a common agreement between participants and organisers (peer-to-peer approach).
 
Sphere of influence
- NAs could raise awareness about possibilities, e.g., inclusion support to involve mental health experts in the programmes.
- NAs could organise preparation material and training for organisations.
- Having a platform to share best practices, knowledge, etc. (organised by SALTO).
- Partner-up with other organisations or experts in the field, go to decision makers, umbrella organisations and institutions.
 
Out of control
- inclusion of psychologists.
- Raise awareness within formal education.
Intersectional Approach to ID in the Youth Field - Amel Yacef
Picture
 Speaker: Amel Yacef,  National Youth Council of Ireland​
The workshop addressed the current societal trends and challenges that impact the youth field and are particularly important for the inclusion of marginalised youth. It touched upon intersectionality as the approach to ensure that the experiences and needs of those affected by racism, sexism, classism, homophobia, ableism, and other forms of oppression are at the centre of any inclusive practice.
salto_id_forum_dec_21_-_amel_yacef.pdf
File Size: 3591 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

Brief description of the workshop
  • What is my framework?
  • What does intersectionality mean within that context?
  • How is any of this relevant to the work you do in the sector?
  • Which challenges do you face?
 
Main learning points
  • What is the framework we operate from?
  • What do we believe the role of youth work should be in the service we provide?
  • What is our understanding of the role of youth work in equality, equity and justice? Is our focus equal opportunities or equal outcomes?
  • What are the frameworks we use to identify needs and carry needs analysis?
  • Do those frameworks shed light on our blind spots?
  • To have a discussion/conversation to understand how to respect personal experience.
  • Empathy.
  • Attitude: not imposing on others.
  • Speaking with calm, patience.
  • Time to research and reflect on the topic.
  • Not comparing, but seeing the other.
 
Main challenge(s)?
  • Stay on the equity, there is little influence on the justice part.
  • It’s difficult to do, you bring it to the surface, but then what?
  • Focus on the blind spot, things we can and can’t do. Where is the power and how can use it?
 
Sphere of control
- Self-education is the key.
- Conscious conversations with the field.
- Finding different ways to communicate.
- Identify contact point in the NA for each issue.
- Good practices on the ground.
- Raising awareness.
- Online campaigns, community meetings around tables.
 
Sphere of influence
- Using simple tools, transmitting knowledge to the team.
- Active study visits of the NA.
- Passing information to policymakers
- Finding a larger network for promotion, not only youthwork partnerships with other NA, to get input from specialised organisations partnership with schools, University, other institutions, to exchange.
 
Out of control
- How to react to discrimination and lack of flexibility.
 
Other remarks
If you don’t have a lens that has be trained to look at how various forms of discrimination come together, you’re unlikely to develop a set of policies that will be inclusive as they need to be.
​I&D in times of crisis - Pascal Debruyne
Picture
​Speaker: Pascal Debruyne, Odisee University College Brussels, Belgium

The workshop addressed the challenges vulnerable groups face in times of societal disruptions, like pandemics, economic crises, and social upheaval.
Brief description
  • Case example of a solidarity initiative, realised during Covid19 pandemic.
  • General reflections on social work, and the failures of the welfare state.
  • 'Shadow' social work, done by informal actors.
  • Main challenges for inclusion/diversity issues in times of crisis.
  • Possible solutions: what can be done at different levels (organisations, cooperation & systemic).
 
Main learning points
  • Bottom-up, grassroots solidarity projects can cater to the needs of those that are forgotten or not properly addressed by the State in times of crisis.
  • 3 core principles of mutual aid projects:
  • - Mutual aid projects work to meet survival needs and build shared understanding about why people do not have what they need.
  • - Mutual aid projects mobilize people, expand solidarity, and build movements.
  • - Mutual aid projects are participatory, solving problems through collective action rather than waiting.
  • General insight: we can do a lot of things! But do not forget that also systemic change is needed, we cannot solve everything.
Questions & answers
  • Q - Can solidarity projects like the case brought up by the speaker (Ghent Solidarity Fund) be sustainable over time, how to make them sustainable?
  • A - We need to understand that many of the social issues emerging or becoming visible during corona existed before.
  • Q - Is charity always "political" in nature? How to move from charity to mutual solidarity?
  • - How to avoid patronizing the 'vulnerable' groups? How to guard the barriers between volunteers and target groups (what is the right 'distance')?
 
Main challenge(s)?
  • Lack of access to services.
  • Reinvent themselves.
  • Time pressure to make decisions.
  • Unclear responsibilities.
  • Different political interests.
  • Lack of trust between each other, but also towards the government - more isolated people, lack of informal support.
  • Lack of trust and insecurity of people.
  • Scarcity vs. ownership as a ground to populism.
  • Human rights violations.
  • Supporting personnel becoming burn out.
  • How to keep the good practices.
 
Sphere of control
- Accessibility of your own organization.
- Make showing solidarity easy: provide formats such as 'a delayed coffee'.
- Create spaces where citizens can meet.
- Overcome disconnected.
- Social services present in the field, outreaching.
- Peer-to-peer support, to overcome issues like burn-out in social work & youth work.
 
Sphere of influence
- Influence the view presented in media about vulnerable groups, make their voices and stories heard, provide training to map the needs of vulnerable groups.
- Peer-to-peer learning.
- Coordinated efforts, including all relevant stakeholders.
- Create one stop shops where vulnerable groups can access different social services at once.
- Turning services "inside-out".
- Use grassroots movements and their support by citizens to make political statements and influence structural issues.
- Fight against polarisation, overcome societal divides.
- Focus on long-term solutions.
- Pressure for flexible funding formats.
 
Out of control
- Systemic changes that are at the root of large societal issues (poverty, inequality, ....).
International ID Projects in the Age of Digitalization (online group) - Ülly Enn 
Picture
Speaker: Ülly Enn - Tallinn Technical University - TalTech, Estonia
​
The workshop created space to discuss possible ways of ensuring inclusion and diversity in online settings. It focused on trends and potential challenges regarding social inclusion from a perspective of the digital age.
salto_id_forum_üe_slides_1.12.pdf
File Size: 7708 kb
File Type: pdf
Download File

​Reactions and reflections
  • Youth work as supporting activities initiated by young people.
  • Specific approach - we need to think about all aspects when and why use digital/online process.
  • People with disabilities - easier access to different projects.
  • Youth work as supporting activities initiated by young people.
  • Online events/recording give access to cultural events for people with a rare disease for instance.
  • Hybrid events can facilitate and enhance participation of young people with disabilities.
  • We are not really prepared for digitalization and must improve our competences.
  • How to reach those without digital accessibility.
  • How can we reach Young People in NEET situation?
  • Digital Competences are heterogenous among youngsters.
  • Digital security is an important aspect.
  • Accessibility of digital tools is not always given / is very diverse.
  • A budget for supporting the equipment of young persons with hardware and
  • software etc. is important for their participation in certain kinds of projects
  • Two approaches:
  • - We start thinking about tools and methods we need for digital youth work.
  • - We think about the fact that digitalisation changes what our young persons need.
 
Main Challenge(s)?
  • Digital support.
  • Digital Inequality.
  • Screen fatigue.
  • Commitment to attend online events is low.
  • There is a threshold to join online: safe spaces in the online fields for minority groups.
  • Digital is less rewarding as it difficult to create a sense of community.
  • Gap between youth workers and youth (differently equipped).
  • How to combine digitalization and human contact in inclusion projects.
  • No access because of economic issues.
  • Absence of documents for visually impaired or hearing-impaired people.
  • Those who do not want to participate digitally.
  • Insufficient IT tools for young people from rural areas.
  • Lack or insufficiency of documents suitable for age level of young people.
  • Lack of digital skills of youth workers.
  • Language barriers.
  • Accessibility of the online tools for project applications in Erasmus+ and ESC.
  • Eurodesk centres can be an important actor for support.
  • Digital accessibility: Internet in some places is expensive, not everyone has the necessary tools to access digital events/projects
  • Digital competences are heterogenous among youngsters.
 
Sphere of control
- Online informal meetings with organisations related to the needs.
- To bridge the technology generation gap to involve youngsters from the beginning.
- Exchange with youngsters.
- Screen fatigue: blended offers; use different digital tools that are more attractive, switch to chat; reduce time; offer mindfulness exercises.
-  Talk about digital wellbeing.
- Allow active participation and involvement from the start.
- Share experience and networking among organisations.
- Raise awareness about bullying.
- NGOs can reach out to schools and educational institutions to share digital skills.
- Training about the challenge of fake news.
- Include digital elements in all projects not only for partners but also for participants.
- Offer training to overcome language barriers.
- Accessibility to digital tools: Training and support; sharing good practices.
- Create partnerships.
 
Sphere of influence
- Collaborate with research to find the gaps (needs/target groups) in order to define digitalization.
- Influence programme rules and application forms.
- A toolkit on inclusive digital youth work.
- Funding support on a national/regional level.
- Reducing digital gap between EU countries: EC initiative + EU funding support.
- Cyber security policies.
- NA officers: influence policies, program rules & funding rules.
- Funding software and, in some cases, hardware.
 
Out of control
- Little or no influence over policy making.
- Connectivity/digital infrastructure.
- Solve the economic issues in the projects, but not in their life situation.
- Digital accessibility: Internet in some places is expensive, not everyone has the necessary tools to access digital events/projects.
Picture
  • VISIONS OF THE FUTURE 
  • I&D ROADMAP
<
>

Visions of the future 

Picture
Two keynote speakers provided some hints on how ID may develop by discussing what the world may look like in 50 or 100 years and how the youth work field will answer to the changes in our societies.
  • Nicklas Larsen, Copenhagen Institute for Future Studies: Megatrends and Future Literacy. Presentation slides available for download 
  • Ricardo Borges de Castro, European Policy center: Future of European Union and its programmes. Presentation slides available for download
WHAT DOES THE FUTURE LOOK LIKE?  -  OUTCOMES
Picture
Expert presentations led the way to the final workshop preparing us to the long-term challenges and solutions, where  small groups 'pictured'  their answers to the following questions:
  • How will my local framework be in 2050 / 2120 based on what we just heard?
  • ​How do I want my organization to be in 2050 / 2120? What actions and cooperations should we have to be relevant and resilient?
  • What do we have to do during the next 7 years to get to that future?
+ Click on the pictures  for a larger view.
Picture
We also enjoyed a special  presentation of the new I&D Roadmap ​by: 
  • Tony Geudens, project officer Salto Inclusion & Diversity
  • Susie Nicodemi, ID Roadmap Coordinator
We were the  first people in Europe to see the Roadmap at the ID Forum, and start thinking what the first steps will be to travel on that road to more inclusion and diversity in the EU Programmes for youth. 
Picture
This co-created document details the road we need to travel in the EU youth programmes to implement the Inclusion & Diversity Strategy for the Erasmus+ programme and the European Solidarity Corps. We can only reach our destination if all stakeholders contribute to inclusion and diversity in the youth sector.
 
This I&D Road Map is the fruit of consultations with National Agencies, inclusion experts and beneficiaries working with young people with fewer opportunities. It also includes elements of the Inclusion & Diversity Strategy for Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps, results of the SALTO ID Survey (2019) and collated good practice from SALTO publications and research.

​After the presentation, participants made commitments towards the implementation of the ID Roadmap and identified needs at EU level.
COMMITMENTS FROM LAUNCH SESSION
After the presentation, in small country/region-specific groups, participants listed their commitments towards the implementation of the ID Roadmap.

Austria
  • Translate for German speaking NAs – early 2022.
  • Plan how to use on national level.
Malta
  • Have specific commitments after national working group discussions.
  • Internal NA staff training, and for beneficiaries + newcomers – work with experts and trainers, well-experienced organisations as mentors.
Estonia
  • Higher percentage of organisations working with inclusion (people with diverse backgrounds), higher percentage of young people with fewer opportunities taking part in programmes, less empty applications, and tourists – reduce the serial applicants. With – broad sector of organisations and fields – beyond usual network (sportif, educational) special attention to local municipalities.
Greece
  • Will report to NA about Roadmap, give support tools/practices to new grassroots organisations and informal groups, plan for I&D with local municipalities and institutions / NGO.
Turkey
  • Priority – Encourage networking for I&D (Interconnection with others).
  • Priority – Reduce barriers – Support for overcoming obstacles – Deliver training.
Portugal
  • Already have specific roads, milestones and actions planned out, using the Roadmap as common ground for discussion between National Delegation + Id Officer of NA. They will start in January, with specific organisations named and specific target groups defined.
Norway
  • Provide beneficiaries with relevant information and preparation for mental health in projects.
  • Translate Roadmap to Norwegian.
Latvia
  • Develop national inclusion strategy with NGOs, Municipalities, etc. in 2022.
Ireland
  • Reaching the hard to reach.
  • Young people drive what they need, the action.
  • Celebrating experiences will drive future buy-in and engagement results.
  • Better E+.
  • Do with organisations, grass roots, youth workers, young people experiencing barriers, learning from organisations.
​NEEDS FROM EUROPEAN LEVEL
SALTO
  • SALTO could translate front page (and other pages) to programme country languages.
  • Materials can be shared with other organisations (resource list to be shared on SALTO Roadmap web page).
  • Training for NAs on how to implement the Roadmap, how to use the Roadmap on practical level – ID Talks – how to implement your strategy.
  • Guidance for beneficiaries (video/publication) how to consider challenges (inclusion, diversity, mental health, other challenges in projects).
  • More simple language/communication.
 
ID Steering Group
  • Approachability of ID Steering Group.
 
Between NAs
  • Cooperation for direct outreach and co-ordination of activities – synergies between countries.
  • SALTO (online) training for whole NA team for using the Roadmap.
 
European Commission
  • EC – more budget for I&D staff (increase resource, show it’s a priority).
  • EC – better monitoring system with trustworthy data to know what we are achieving (or not) in ID [Measuring Impact].
  • Reduce barriers in E+/ESC programmes. Make programmes more friendly for young people with fewer opportunities.
  • Increase financial support.
    • E.g. €7 for one mentor day is not enough
    • Cover staff costs of inclusion organisations in the project amounts.
Picture
IDForum is funded by the Erasmus+ and European Solidarity Corps EU programmes and coordinated by SALTO-YOUTH Inclusion and Diversity Resource Centre
  • IDForum 2021
    • Background >
      • Team
      • Speakers
      • Participants
  • Programme Outcomes
  • Evaluation